State Funding Drops To Lowest In University History

With the new fiscal year set to begin midnight Wednesday, UConn is facing a minimum $28.2 million reduction in state funding from the previous year, dropping the rate of funding the state lends to its flagship university to an all-time low.

Gov. Dannel Malloy has the power to additionally reduce the amount appropriated to UConn by 5 percent before midnight tonight, which could become 6.5 percent depending on a vote by the legislature, which  is currently in special session.

Any further reductions would force the University’s Board of Trustees to revise the new fiscal year’s spending plan, which was finalized on June 24 and divvied up a total of $1.3 billion – $243.2 million from the state – for UConn Storrs and its branch campuses.

“We are waiting and watching and hoping,” UConn Spokesperson Stephanie Reitz said.

The state will now fund only 30 percent of the university’s budget, an appreciable decrease from 43 percent in 2000, and roughly 50 percent in the early 90’s, Reitz said.

State lawmakers originally proposed to cut UConn’s funding by $40 million, but later scaled that back to $28.2 million upon hearing pleas from those who would be most impacted.

”I think it was helpful for legislators to hear student voices (in February). It had an impact in how law makers made their cuts and I believe and I hope it will continue to,” Retiz said.

UConn is not alone in receiving less state higher-education funding.

From 2003 to 2012 the national average for public university funding from their respective state dropped from 32 to 23 percent, according to a report to the Chairman, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate in 2014.

“We are grateful for what we receive,” Reitz said. “We are in better shape than other universities.”

The state’s support is not only being used to fund the day-to-day operations of the school, but infrastructure for the future as well.

Nineteen million of the $243.2 million grant is designated for the Next Generation Connecticut project, which Reitz said the university is obligated to put towards NextGren as a part of an agreement made in spring 2013.

The state funding reductions resulted in $14.6 million less than requested specifically for Next Generations, making UConn unable to proceed with all of the hiring and student scholarships that were planned for this year. The school’s employment of 50 faculty members across all campuses reaches only half of their original goal for this year.

“The hardest thing will now be to get the student to faculty ratio to the 15:1 that we have been striving for,” Reitz said. “We were at 16:1 last year, but it is going to increase now.”

UConn has already enrolled 250 additional freshman in the class of 2019, and despite funding cuts to basic operations and Next Gen – which has resulted in a significant slowing of the planned faculty hiring – the University will continue to increase class sizes each year, Reitz said.

“We are committed to bringing in more (students) because of the dorms under construction and the promise to the state,” Reitz said. “The Next Gen building projects will not be affected. The money for them comes from a capitol bond. The STEM and honors dorms are coming along fine and will finish on schedule.”

The growing student to faculty ratio will force current professors to teach more sections, as well as faculty who have completed research projects to take on more undergraduate classes, Reitz said.

Although faculty will be increasing at UConn, staff and mid-level administrative positions will be seeing rounds of layoffs in order to compensate for the decreased funding.

For example, the Bursar’s offices at all branches have been merged into a single office based in Storrs. The maintenance crews – which used to be separated into residential and non-residential departments – will now merge as one department.

“A lot of empty positions will just be eliminated instead of refilled,” Reitz said. “When people leave throughout the whole year (2015-2016) there will not be a new hire in their place. There is no guarantee that any position that comes open will be filled.”



Obit: Legacy of poly-sci professor extends beyond classroom

With the passing away of Professor Emeritus George Cole on June 10, the University of Connecticut lost one of its most notable luminaries in the field of political science.  Cole, who was 80 years old, died at his home in Mansfield.

“I loved George’s laughter and was impressed (and at times was intimidated) by the breadth of his knowledge, from shepherding to historiography,” Professor of Political Science Cyrus Zirakzadeh said.

Cole was born to Canadian immigrant parents on March 18, 1935 in Plainville, Massachusetts.  Following his graduation from the University of Massachusetts in 1956, he began serving in the United States Air Force, and a year later he married his life long partner Joan Washburn.

After serving in the military, Cole continued his educational pursuit, ultimately receiving his Ph. D from the University of Washington. After initially teaching at Allegheny College, he joined the UConn Political Science Department in 1969.

“Within the department, George’s devotion to all graduate students was legendary,” Zirakzadeh said. “His patient, nurturing, and joyful relationship with his doctoral students became a model for younger members of the faculty, like me.”

Throughout his career Cole had been the recipient of many honors such as two Fulbright-Hays awards, becoming a Fellow at the National Institute of Justice and serving as the chairman of the UConn Political Science Department.

Zirakzadeh recalls a particular incident, which demonstrated to him just how indelible of a mark Cole had left in the field of criminal justice.

“When I first arrived at UConn, I visited Cambridge and had dinner with an assistant professor of public law at Harvard University,” Zirakzadeh said.

“He told me that George’s text on criminal justice was famous throughout the nation and was considered the standard treatment of the field at major law schools, including the University of Michigan, where the professor had earned his JD and PhD.”

Cole was an avid traveler and through the Fulbright-Hays Program was able to conduct criminal justice research in England and the former nation of Yugoslavia.

He eventually retired from the University of Connecticut in 1997.

During his memorial service on June 20, Cole’s family requested that instead of receiving flowers, donations be made to the UConn Foundation to support the George F. Cole Dissertation Fellowship. This award is bestowed on a political science graduate student who is working on a dissertation in public law.

“I know of no one more committed (than Cole) to the future of the political science department at UConn.” Zirakzadeh said.

International Entrepreneurship Program Seeks to Form Connections Between Future World Leaders

For the sixth year in a row, the University of Connecticut will host an international leadership exchange program for North and Sub-Saharan African students, which includes a weekend homestay with an American family; and program coordinators are looking for interested participants.

The Global Training and Development Institute (GTDI) is able to conduct this Summer Institute for Student Leaders in Social Entrepreneurship through U.S. Department of State grant funds. African student leaders from 40 universities are selected by a rigorous application process, and attend the five–week program that consists of classes and workshops centered on entrepreneurship, business, finance and marketing in order to help make a difference in their homeland communities. The international students live in on-campus apartments during the program, with the exception of the weekend homestay, according to UConn’s Daily Digest.

UConn’s weekend homestay program will run from July 24th to July 26th, benefitting both African students and American families due to the exposure of differing cultures. Host families are sought out throughout Connecticut, Rhode Island and southern Massachusetts, GTDI Director Roy Pietro, said.

“Over 200 American families have hosted in the past five years, and the consensus opinion is that (it) can be an extremely rewarding cross–cultural experience,” Pietro said.

Interested families are interviewed ahead of time and provide references for the U.S. Department of State. UConn staff also visit their homes to inspect the bedroom and living spaces to ensure that they meet the U.S. State Department’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) guidelines.

“This experience provides our visiting international students a glimpse into the everyday life of an American family, as they attend community events, meet with other Americans and have meals with family members and friends,” Pietro said.

The two – way cultural connections obtained through this experience also allows Americans to learn about life in Africa, from local policies, to socioeconomic hardship. This learning process builds understanding and relationships between the United States and countries throughout Africa, Pietro said.

In a UConn Today article about the program run in 2014, Pietro said making an impact on African societies starts with just a few people. He stated that even if a portion of the 40 international student leaders take productive measures back home, an impact has been established.

UConn is the only institution in the state that offers this kind of international partnership. Due to the success of the program, the U.S. Department of State recently granted the GTDI the privilege to replicate this program for 40 student leaders from 10 countries in Southeast Asia. The program will aim to enhance future leader relations with the United States and Southeast Asia. UConn will host the program in the fall 2015 and spring 2016 semesters, allowing interested families another opportunity to provide weekend homestays for the visiting students, Pietro said.

To participate or ask questions about becoming a host family for one or two visiting students, contact Program Coordinator Danielle DeRosa at: or 860-486-6305.

Men’s Basketball: Huskies release non-conference schedule

The UConn men’s basketball team released their 2015-16 non-conference schedule Tuesday afternoon.

After two exhibition games against Division II University of Tampa and University of New Haven, the Huskies will open the regular season at home against Maine Friday Nov. 13.

Following home games against New Hampshire and Furman, UConn heads to the Bahamas Nov. 25 for the Battle 4 Atlantis. Although the bracket has yet to be announced, the Huskies are a part of a competitive field that includes Syracuse, Michigan, Gonzaga, Texas, Texas A&M, Washington, and Charlotte.

On Dec. 2, UConn welcomes the first of their two in-state opponents when they take on Sacred Heart. Secondly, the Huskies will take on Central Connecticut at home Dec. 23. Last season, UConn defeated the Blue Devils 81-48.

Sandwiched between Sacred Heart and CCSU are two marquee matchups against Maryland (Dec. 8) and Ohio State (Dec. 12), as well as the Huskies’ first-ever meeting against UMass-Lowell on Dec. 20.

UConn’s game against Maryland will be a part of the Jimmy V Classic at Madison Square Garden. The Huskies did not play a game at the Garden last season for the first time in over 30 years.

The matchup versus Ohio State marks the first time the two schools will meet since the 1999 Final Four, where UConn defeated the Buckeyes 64-58 in the National Semifinals en route to their first NCAA Championship.

The Huskies travel to Texas Dec. 29 for their lone true road non-conference game against the Longhorns to wrap up the home-and-home series between the two schools. Last season, Texas defeated the Huskies 55-54 at Gampel Pavilion on a buzzer beating three-pointer from Jonathan Holmes.

UConn will wrap up their non-conference slate with a home game against former Big East foe Georgetown in their first matchup since the 2012-13 season.

The Huskies’ schedule will be completed when the American Athletic Conference announces the conference schedule later on this summer.

The Holy Trinity: How the Warriors redefined championship basketball

In my NBA Finals preview, I focused on Golden State’s lack of past postseason hardships as the reason why a faction of the public was reluctant to give them the respect the empirical data indicated they deserved.

At the time, however, I knew public doubt stemmed from a confluence of their inexperience as well as their many novel qualities.

NBA Champions, let alone possible dynasties, are not supposed to look like this.

A champion’s best player isn’t supposed to be a 6’3, 190 lb. point guard best known for perimeter shooting. That’s supposed to be a dominant big or historically great wing – Duncan, Jordan.

A champion’s second best player is not supposed to be a 6’7, 230 lb. power forward who actually plays center and is best known for defensive versatility and arrogance. That’s supposed to be an established compliment with a Hall of Fame pedigree – Pippen, Wade, Parker.

A champion’s coach isn’t supposed to be in his first year and readily admit to relying on a 28-year-old video coordinator  for a series-saving lineup move. That’s supposed to be an all-wise, grizzled pillar of stoicism – Auerbach, Jackson, Popovich.

A champion’s Finals MVP is not supposed to be yesteryear’s consolation free agency acquisition coming off the bench to occasionally slow down the series’ actual MVP – that’s a Hall of Famer as well.

Most sacrilegious of all, an NBA Champion isn’t supposed to pave their way by bombing more three’s than any other team in the postseason, often passing up open layups for the possibility of an extra point.

Golden State averaged 30.5 three-point attempts in 21 games this postseason. No other NBA champion in the last 10 years shot more than 22 per postseason game (2011 Dallas), and the same past ten champions shot a composite average of 19.6 three’s per game, 35 percent less than the Warriors.

It’s no secret that many people in and around the league turned their nose up at the idea of a Warriors championship contradicting the “old way of doing things” and becoming a large milestone in the league’s analytic-optimization.

You can hear anti-analytics crusaders like Charles Barkley say it now, “live by the three, die by the three,” while bemoaning the perimeter-focused Warriors’ lack of inside scoring and toughness.

“There’s this supposed war between the purity of basketball and the 3-point line,” Celtics GM Danny Ainge told’s Tom Haberstroh recently.

“The old-time coaches want to control everything, and the three just doesn’t fit into that philosophy,” Mike D’Antoni, one of the league’s first three-point advocates, added.

(Old dudes wanting to keep status quo because that’s the way things have always been done.. doesn’t sound familiar.)

The notion that the Warriors needed to win a championship to validate the application of analytics in basketball is inherently ridiculous, as both the Heat and Spurs were also firm believers in analytics and constructed their championship rosters accordingly.

Keep in mind that when anybody refers to “analytics,” it usually doesn’t encompass anything more complicated than an elementary math lesson. If Player A shoots 100 three’s at a league average 35 percent, and Player B shoots 100 two’s at league average 45 percent, Player A wins by 15 points.

This is not to say that hoisting as many three’s as possible is suddenly the only or best way to win a championship, as clearly every team doesn’t has comparable backcourt shooting and talent.

However, I think Golden State’s jump from 54 wins to 83 wins upon Steve Kerr taking over for Mark Jackson (who tried to mold an offense that mirrored one from the mid-90’s) is yet another case study in how transformative the 3-point shot has become.

From the start, Kerr became hellbent on maximizing his team’s success at the 3-point line, while doing everything possible to take the same away from opponents.

After refusing to relinquish Thompson in a trade to acquire Kevin Love (dissenting from consensus opinion at the time), Kerr quickly abandoned Jackson’s larger, more traditional starting lineup of Curry-Thompson-Iguodala-Lee-Bogut, and opted to start smaller Green in place of Lee, and Barnes, a better perimeter shooter, in place of Iguodala.

The smaller lineup provided more spacing and shooting offensively while also allowing them to switch on most pick-and-rolls defensively with three versatile wing-defenders on the floor, thus allowing opposing shooters less space coming off screens.

The five-man unit (Curry-Thompson-Barnes-Green-Bogut) dominated on both ends, leading all of Golden State’s lineups in regular season plus/minus (+329 in 813 minutes).

Here’s the kicker: Marc Jackson did not play those five players together for a single minute during the 2013-14 regular season.

So much for stubbornly keeping bigger lineups.

The Finals match-up we just witnessed embodied much of the contrast between the old-school ideal that one great player quarterbacks his team come hell or high water, and a analytically-optimized, multi-pronged attack.

While Golden State used ball movement and a fast pace to maximize their open three’s,  Cleveland, to much success, essentially turned into Stanford football playing Oregon and grinded the pace down to take away Golden State’s extra offensive possessions, while creating their own by playing big and pounding the hell out of the offensive boards.

Of course, the two teams’ talent and health disparity nulled any potential evidence of the effectiveness of either, as Golden State would have beaten the broken Cavs playing any style once Kyrie Irving exited.

But if nothing else, the match-up provided a distinct before-and-after of how successful NBA offenses have evolved to function.

It’s become near impossible to win four Finals games by walking the ball up, getting tough inside the paint and hoping one guy can create in isolation.

The Warriors are the future and what nearly every NBA general manager is trying to build: a team that kicks ass on both ends of the floor.. generates additional possessions by playing at a fast pace.. is offensively predicated on ball movement and creating efficient layups and open three’s.. and is defensively predicated on an abundance of athletic wings that can guard multiple positions and switch almost any pick-and-roll.

Unconventional is the new conventional.

“Live by the three, die by the three.”

It’s June, and the Warriors are not only still living, they have breathed life into basketball’s future.   

Live by the three or die.

Following report, UConn students and alum react to Herbst’s salary

The Hartford Courant reports that University of Connecticut President Susan Herbst made $575,000 in 2014, nearly 135% of the national median of $428,000. Students and alum took to the internet to express their thoughts.

President Herbst is “overpaid and underachieving,” said seventh semester pharmacy major Aaron Zheng.

“Many services of the school function independently and communicate poorly,” Zheng continued, “A lot of money is wasted on hiring more staff, instead of quality staff.”

Herbst received a $70,000 raise in 2014, roughly equivalent to the average annual salary of a Connecticut teacher. UConn Board of Trustees Chairman Larry McHugh believes Herbst deserves her salary and says she has “excelled” as president.

“This contract is reflection of that and offers compensation that is in line with that of many other presidents at large public research universities across the nation,” McHugh said in December shortly after Herbst’s contract was renewed.

“President Herbst heads an institution with a budget of $2 billion, more than 30,000 students, seven campuses, an academic medical center and hospital, and more than 9,000 employees,” university spokesperson Stephanie Reitz said, “The compensation for the president of a company of that size would be many multiples of what the president of UConn is paid.”

Reitz also believes that median salary is misleading statistic.

“Comparing the UConn president’s salary against the median nationwide is an apples-to-oranges proposition because that includes many small and very dissimilar institutions,” said Reitz.

“The most appropriate comparisons are against peer institutions which, like UConn, are large and have a complex research enterprise, wide-ranging academic scope, and robust outreach and service missions in their states.”

UConn alum and journalism major, Joe Klar suggests that no university president should receive such pay.

“Justifying her pay because it’s on par with others leaves out the fact that the president of a public institution, taking public money, and constantly raising tuition should not get paid a ‘million’ a year with two houses and a driver,” Klar said.

A post in UConn’s “Buy or Sell” page, started the discussion.



Baseball: Three Huskies Taken in MLB Draft

By Dan Madigan, Associate Sports Editor

Three members of the UConn baseball team were selected within 40 picks of one another on the third day of the 2015 MLB Draft.

Catcher Max McDowell was the first Husky off the board, taken by the Milwaukee Brewers in the 13th round and 391st overall. Second baseman Vinny Siena was taken with the 419th pick in the 14th round by the New York Mets, followed by senior ace Carson Cross, who went to the St. Louis Cardinals 12 picks later at No. 431.

The three selections give UConn baseball a total of 84 draftees in the program’s history.

McDowell finished the 2015 season hitting .286 with seven home runs and 39 RBI. The junior also lead the NCAA in sacrifice flies with 11. The North Huntingdon, Pennsylvania native boasts an impressive mix of power (12 career home runs) and solid defense, throwing out 19 baserunners in his last two years.

Siena bounced back from a sophomore slump to turn in a spectacular junior season, leading the Huskies with a .364 batting average and 54 RBI while adding seven home runs. Siena also recorded a hit in 54 of the Huskies’ 60 games this season, and was named the New England Intercollegiate Baseball Association (NEIBA) Player of the Year for 2015.

As juniors, McDowell and Siena can decide whether to sign with their respective professional teams or return to Storrs for their senior season.

After missing the entire season in 2014 because of shoulder surgery, Cross completed a magnificent senior season in 2015 which earned him Third Team All-American honors by Louisville Slugger and Pitcher of the Year by the American Athletic Conference and NEIBA.

Cross finished his senior season with a 10-2 record while sporting a 2.29 ERA. He also recorded 108 strikeouts and 25 walks in 106 innings pitched.

The redshirt senior tri-captain finished his UConn career with the fourth most strikeouts in school history (222) and the fourth most wins in program history (22). He also is in the Top-10 in innings pitched (254).